Showing posts with label London. Show all posts
Showing posts with label London. Show all posts

Thursday, 19 September 2013

Poverty in the UK: what is poverty, who is poor, why are the poor poor?


JK Rowling has said the government is out of touch with poor people and should focus on helping them into work rather than stigmatising them and hitting them with more cuts.
Writing in her role as president of the single parent support group Gingerbread, the Harry Potter author criticized the coalition's welfare reforms and the characterization of people as either strivers or skivers.

"The government mantra that work is the best route out of poverty is ringing increasingly hollow, with nearly one in three children whose single parent works part-time still growing up in poverty," she said. "Rather than focusing on ever more austerity measures, it is investment in single-parent employment that will allow single parents to work their own way out of poverty."
The attack by Rowling comes almost five years to the day since she donated £1m to Labour, criticizing the Tory message that "a childless, dual-income, married couple is more deserving of a financial pat on the head than those struggling, as I once was, to keep their families afloat in difficult times". It follows the announcement that the Tories will unveil plans for a tax break for married couples in this year's autumn statement.

The award-winning author was herself a single mother struggling to make ends meet when she wrote the first of her best-selling books in the 1990s. She said her self-esteem was tested at the time and single parents were still being stigmatized.
"I find the language of 'skivers versus strivers' particularly offensive when it comes to single parents, who are already working around the clock to care for their children," she wrote on the Gingerbread website. "Such rhetoric drains confidence and self-esteem from those who desperately want, as I did, to get back into the job market."

Rowling wrote that to help single parents back into work, the government should focus on affordable childcare, employee training, make employers embrace flexible hours, and take "a long, hard look at low pay".

She said more single-parent families would lose than gain under the government's flagship universal credit payment, including many in work, because of gaps in childcare provision for many of the poorest families and a loss of support for single parents under 25.
The current benefits system takes into account whether you have a child in determining your personal allowance but under the reforms a single parent under 25 will receive the same rate of allowance as an under-25 without any children.


To do/questions:
  1. Why is Harry Potter sleeping under the stairs?!
  2. Read the text on Rowling's opinions regarding the causes of child poverty in the UK and explain the words and expressions in bold.
  3. Does Rowling think the poor should do like she did: rely on themselves to get out of poverty?
  4. Where are there most poor families in the UK and where are there the least (cf. the map and article)?
  5. Why is the percentage of poor families highest in the largest urban areas?

Thursday, 12 September 2013

Why are things going wrong in the UK?


















Read the article from The Independent: click HERE!

Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks: Lack of faith means Britain is ‘losing the plot’

Britain is “losing the plot” because its increasingly secular society has led to a breakdown of trust affecting marriage, child poverty and the economy, the outgoing Chief Rabbi, Lord Sacks, said on Sunday.

Lord Sacks, who became one of the country’s highest profile religious commentators in 22 years as Chief Rabbi, said in an interview that “individualism is no way to build a society” and that religious faith helped bolster trust in society as a whole.

However, the National Secular Society dismissed the suggestion, saying secularism had led to a fairer, more tolerant society in which people thought for themselves and were “less obedient” to religions.

Lord Sacks, speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Sunday programme, said that the idea of the “big society” was strongest in the UK’s different religions “because that’s what we do, we care for one another”.

But, asked whether Britain was more or less fractured than it had been, he said: “I think we’re losing the plot actually. I think we haven’t really noticed what’s happening in Britain.”

Lord Sacks pointed to the 2008 banking crisis as one example of the problems caused by a lack of religion. “When you begin to lose faith and society becomes very, very secularised, you first see a breakdown of institutions, whether they are financial, economic or… marriage is an institution,” he said.

“And then you ask why they have broken down and you arrive at one word: trust. Trust means having faith in somebody else to keep their faith with you, so there’s something about religious faith that undergirds trust as a whole in society and when trust breaks down you see institutions break down.

“Individualism is no way to build a society... if people work for the maximum possible benefit to themselves, then we will not have trust in industry, economics and financial institutions, we will not see marriages last.”

He said some non-religious parents wanted their children to attend faith schools because they recognised this and wanted their offspring “to grow up with a strong moral sense”.

Lord Sacks said politicians were “part of the breakdown of marriage in the West” over the past 50 years, but he did not blame them or governments for the general lack of trust. “It’s the fault of what we call culture, which is society talking to itself,” he said.

“The truth is that the breakdown of marriage has meant the creation of an entirely new phenomenon of child poverty affecting three million children in Britain today that we thought had been eliminated. So children get to be the victims.”

The Bishop of Bradford, the Rt Rev Nick Baines, agreed with Lord Sacks. “Having moved from a generation that put the common good first, we have now created a culture which puts ‘I’, ‘me’ and ‘my’ first,” he said. “This inevitably has consequences for society and Lord Sacks is right to reiterate what Christian leaders have been saying for years.”

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said Lord Sacks’ idea that secularisation had led to a decline in trust was “not surprising” but “unfortunate”.

“I think a secular society is a fairer society, where everybody is treated equally, regardless of their beliefs or non-belief,” he said. “I don’t think that the move away from religion is anything to do with trust in society at all. Society, as it has become more educated, has become less blindly obedient, particularly to religion.”


Questions/to do:
  1. Describe and comment the above photos of the East End of London (how has the photographer depicted the area in his photo essay)?
  2. Explain the terms in bold in the article above by Ian Johnston.
  3. Summarise the article from The Independent (in three short sentences at most).
  4. What do you think of Lord Sacks' analysis of the causes of the UK's present state (is loss of faith/lack of trust the only cause of the apparent decline of British society)?
  5. From your point of view is a secular society better than a society in which religion plays an important role?
  6. Do you think French society is also "losing the plot" (why/not)?
  7. Are YOU more for individualism or more for a strong Welfare State?